Mock benchmarks tell you how a model performs against fixtures. They do not tell you how it behaves against your APIs, your latency, your rate limits, your tool permissions, or your messy data. Runloop runs each evaluation in an isolated Devbox connected to production-like systems, so model scores reflect real workload behavior before you ship.
Each evaluation session can call your actual APIs, handle real response latency, resolve real data inconsistencies, and run under real rate limits. A model that scores well against static fixtures can still fail against live systems — Runloop surfaces that gap before production.
Launch hundreds or thousands of isolated sessions across candidate models. Define the dimensions that matter, and Runloop runs them across every model, aggregating per task, per model, and per dimension. Model comparison stops being sequential guesswork.
Every run captures the full configuration used to produce the result, as a structured artifact your team can hand to engineering leadership, procurement, customers, or auditors.
Runloop shows whether a cheaper or faster model holds up across your real task mix, comparing quality, latency, reliability, and true cost side by side. A cheaper model that retries on failures can erase its own savings, and the suite surfaces that before you switch.
Runloop gives teams a shared way to execute, compare, and reproduce evaluations without each group building its own harness. Standardized task suites, environments, and run artifacts replace improvised scripts with documentation that supports governance, procurement, and customer review.
Enterprise buyers want evidence your agent works on the tasks, data, integrations, and failure modes it will face in production. Runloop runs evaluation suites against redacted or customer-like workloads, then produces structured results tied to the exact configuration used, so the proof exists before the deal stalls.
We’re dedicated to solving the complex challenges of productionizing AI for software engineering at scale.
Runloop provides every team with a shared way to execute, compare, and reproduce evaluations, so no team has to build its own harness. Improvised scripts produce results that cannot be compared across teams or audited later. Shared task suites, environments, and run artifacts replace those scripts with documentation that supports governance, procurement, and customer review.
Runloop outputs each evaluation as a structured artifact tied to the exact configuration that produced it, ready to hand to engineering leadership, procurement, customers, or auditors. Enterprise buyers want evidence that your agent is built to handle the tasks, data, integrations, and failure modes it will encounter in production. Running suites against redacted or customer-like workloads and binding the results to their configurations ensures the proof exists before the deal stalls.
Runloop captures the model version, task set, environment, prompts, tools, and scoring configuration for every run, so any result can be reproduced exactly. An evaluation you cannot reproduce cannot be defended when a model changes. Locking the full configuration lets your team rerun the same setup after a version change and compare results against the previous baseline.
Runloop runs your evaluation under real rate limits and failure conditions, and aggregates cost alongside reliability, so a model that retries often stops reading as cheap. Headline token pricing ignores the value of failures. Define a cost dimension that accounts for retries and failed calls, and Runloop scores it against real behavior, surfacing when a cheaper model erases its own savings, and when a faster or smaller model holds up across your real task mix.
Runloop launches hundreds or thousands of isolated evaluation sessions across candidate models in parallel, then aggregates results per task, per model, and per dimension. Sequential testing forces you to guess which model wins in each comparison. Running every model against the same task suite in parallel replaces that guesswork with side-by-side results on the dimensions you define: quality, latency, reliability, and cost.